[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is "VIGRA Artistic License" licence free and GPL-compatible ?



On Mon, 26 Sep 2005 22:12:00 -0400 Joe Smith wrote:

> > However, this one forces modified works to be in the Public Domain,
> > which
> >is nowhere near the terms of the original work.
> 
> Since this is derived from Artisic, it is assumed freely available
> means the  same as it does there, which includes public domain, or
> posting the source  publicly.

Wait: "Freely Available" *is* defined at the beginning of the license:

| "Freely Available" means that no fee is charged for the item.  It
| also means that recipients of the item may redistribute it under
| the same conditions they received it.

It seems that, if I want to distribute modified versions of the Library,
I must place my modifications in the Public Domain (a non-free
requirement, since it fails DFSG#3) _or_ otherwise distribute them
without charging any fees (another non-free requirement, since it fails
DFSG#1).

If this is the case, I think that we lack free paths through this
license and must conclude that VIGRA does not currently comply with the
DFSG.

-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpLm6kL4pPeU.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: