Re: CDDL, OpenSolaris, Choice-of-venue and the star package ...
Scripsit Michael Poole <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Marco d'Itri writes:
>> Sure, but the DFSG is not about a license being good or bad. There are
>> plenty of "bad" licenses which are free.
> Only for a strange definition of "free" (such that some might accuse
> you of wanting to put non-free things into main).
Licenses with patch clauses are widely considered "bad" even though
they are explicitly free according to the DFSG.
Henning Makholm "... not one has been remembered from the time
when the author studied freshman physics. Quite the
contrary: he merely remembers that such and such is true, and to
explain it he invents a demonstration at the moment it is needed."