Re: Linuxsampler license
On 9/16/05, Humberto Massa Guimarães <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > I just wonder how can BSD/MIT/... be "GPL compatible" not having
> > section 3 of the LGPL.
> Everything distributable under the terms of BSD/MIT, is also
> distributable under the terms of the GPL because BSD/MIT (2 and
> 3 clauses) is *less* restrictive than the GPL.
Being less restrictive doesn't make it the GPL. Neither BSD nor MIT
allow you to turn their licensing terms and conditions into GPL terms