Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)
Andrew Suffield <email@example.com> schrieb/wrote:
> Your entire argument is based on the fact that it's nonsense for
> dynamic linking because replacing one external run-time library with
> another shouldn't change the copyright status of the program using it.
> Yes, it's nonsense - but you're the one who introduced it.
Yes, I did. On purpose. To proof by contradiction that it's wrong.