Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)
> > Now seriously, can you please explain to me:
> > 1. do you think programX is a derivative work of libopenssl?
> > 2. why?
> > 3. do you think programX is a derivative work of libnovossl?
> > 4. why?
> > I keep making questions, and you keep giving me non-sequiturs.
> You keep asking questions that don't have answers because you phrase
> them in terms of dynamic linking all the time.
> None of these four questions are answerable because the only thing
> you've said is that programX is dynamically linked to libssl and that
> both these packages contain a libssl file.
> THAT IS NOT RELEVANT INFORMATION.
What is the relevant information, then? I'll provide it.
> As I said the last time you asked this exact same question, it depends
> on all the stuff you haven't said. I also sketched out the conditions
> for the various possible answers. I'm not going to repeat it again.
Please, point me to the sketch, because I could not find it.