Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)
Yorick Cool wrote:
> The reasoning is pretty simple. As Sean said, it is based on the
> understanding that the GPL is a contract.
Yeah. Except that everybody and his dog knows that the FSF's
position is that GPL != contract. Moglen and RMS now call it
"The Constitution" (of the GNU Republic, I suppose).
C'mon, the GPL drafter RMS is on record: