[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: GPL, yet again. (The kernel is a lot like a shared library)

On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:30:17PM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> >> No, you are not "telling me why my argument is broken". If you are
> >> trying, you're not being very clear. Why is my argument broken exactly?
> >
> > By trivially continuing it to the next obvious point, it concludes
> > that the GPL doesn't work. Therefore it's broken somewhere. Figuring
> > out where is left as an exercise for the students. I really don't care
> > about the details.
> Ah, but this is based on the assumption that the GPL actually does
> work.  The argument was intended to show that it doesn't, and
> apparently succeeds at this.

I am acutely disinterested in that debate because it's long and
boring, but there's a lot of law professors who like it and think that
the GPL does work. I suggest you go argue with them instead.

  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: