On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 04:23:51PM -0700, Sean Kellogg wrote: > Oh, wow... here my thought was people felt six months wasn't long enough... > not too long. I suppose that certainly could be a problem for the manner in > which Debian distributes, however, I don't think it is a DFSG problem. It's a fee. Pet a cat, again. Additionally, it's impossible for us to accomplish with the current archive structure, so it's non-distributable even in non-free as far as we're concerned. > I think you would be better off changing the language from "available" to > "distribute" to clear up an uncertainty. I think that the phrasing of complex license clauses should be done by lawyers. We don't need another repeat of the Artistic debacle. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature