Re: LGPL module linked with a GPL lib
** Michael Poole ::
> Potential penalties are irrelevant to my question. You assume a
> priori that such linking is a violation of the GPL. My question was
> why that assumption is valid. As I explained above, his citation of
> case law does not fit the facts.
The only good answer people in d-l gave me to the question: "why is the assumption that such linking is a violation of the GPL valid?" is "because Eben Moglen said so in the GPL FAQ, and he is a law teacher, so it must be true".