Re: MP3 decoder packaged with XMMS
> On 7/13/05, Raul Miller <email@example.com> wrote:
> > It's difficult to create JPEG image rendering software without using
> > technologies described by MP3 patents.
On 7/13/05, Michael K. Edwards <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> So do tell us where MP3 patents fit -- what patents, which claims, and
> what part of JPEG compression?
I very carefully made a distinction between "technology described by
the patents" and "patented technology" in the message you're responding
One example of technology where this distinction should be clear is
the use of time -> frequency domain mapping.