Re: MP3 decoder packaged with XMMS
"Michael K. Edwards" <email@example.com> wrote: [...]
> If I were defending, say, an Ogg/Vorbis implementation [...] I
> would argue that a wavelet transform is sufficiently different [...]
Wavelet transforms are not the only thing the format supports, but it
may be usable to defend a particular encoder.
> If I were defending an MP3 decoder, I would
> say instead that the decoder doesn't realize the invention because it
> doesn't know or care whether the encoder used the quantization scheme
> that the disclosure teaches.
That seems like it might be tenable in general, though.
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct