on Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 04:16:29PM -0400, Joey Hess (joeyh@debian.org) wrote:
> Karsten M. Self wrote:
> > debian-legal and DPL added to distribution.
>
> I'm afraid that by escalating this unnecessarily, as well as resorting
> to certian rhetoric (for which I cannot be bothered to do a
> point-by-point rebuttal), you've convinced me it's best I bow out of the
> discussion, permantly.
>
> There are about 200 other d-i contributors who can commit some fix or
> the other for this. I hope that they keep license compatability and the
> general badness of ad-hoc licenses in mind when doing so.
I'm more than happy to license compatibly to any specified DFSG license,
including GPL, for use here. I am the original author, that's my
prerogative.
My issue isn't specific licensing terms. It's not use. It's
attribution.
GPL licensing, e.g., with attribution, would be satisfactorially.
Peace.
--
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
Jeff Waugh: Can't see the trees for the trees...
- http://zgp.org/pipermail/linux-elitists/2004-January/008588.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature