[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Alternatives to the Affero General Public License

Mark Rafn wrote:

I'd like to encourage you to think less along the lines "it's currently a web server, so the license should cater to that case" and more like "people should be able to make things out of this that I haven't thought of, using methodologies yet undreamt". This can't happen if you're prescribing things like network protocols, output text, or specific behaviors.

If I can't turn it into a random-number service that runs on my phone over some crazy bluetooth RPC mechanism, it ain't free.

I've been considering this, and have written a completely different clause, with no mention of computer networks, HTTP, or anything such. It might, however, be more difficult to enforce. I tried to write it in such a way that giving somebody SSH access to your computer does not necessitate providing source for all of your programs under this license ... that was the hardest part, and makes it read a bit kludgely. I doubt that it is compliant with the Dissident Problem by your opinions (< plural your), but I think that it's well within line of all of the other requirements, and as an added bonus isn't tied to any particular technology.
This would not be 2(d), but a new clause between 3 and 4.

If you provide to a person or persons a means of accessing an interactive interface to the Program which does not include access to the source code, object code or executable, you must also provide to that person or those persons (henceforth called "Indirect Users") access to the complete source code of the Program in one of the following ways: a) Cause the Program to provide its source code in said interactive interface upon the request of an Indirect User; or, b) Make a means of immediate retrieval of the Program's source code easily visible to all Indirect Users; or, c) Provide a written offer, easily visible to all Indirect Users and valid for at least three years, to give to any third party, for a charge no more than your cost of physically performing source distribution, a complete machine-readable copy of the corresponding source code, to be distributed under the terms of Sections 1 and 2 above on a medium customarily used for software interchange.


- Gregor Richards

PS: While it would be great for me if I could find some way to get a license with some provision like this considered DFSG free (nothing is impossible! ;) ), I would also like your opinions on whether you think that this would cause any undue harm besides non-DFSG-compliance (unnecessary trouble for innocent users, etc)

Reply to: