Re: Linux mark extortion
On 6/17/05, Bruce Perens <email@example.com> wrote:
> Raul Miller wrote:
> >Reading the LMI site, they're only requiring a license on
> >uses of Linux which are not labelling OS software.
> Maybe you misread it. According to the license terms, "AUTHORIZED
> GOODS/SERVICES", including software, do require a license.
I don't think that's valid a valid interpretation.
Linux already has already been established as meaning the linux kernel
as well as distributions involving the linux kernel. It's a generic
term in that context.
That doesn't mean it's a generic term in all contexts -- there's no
widely used Linux certification test suite, for example.
Is there anything else that makes you think that this will be a
concern for Debian?