On Thu, Jun 16, 2005 at 01:24:55AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > I find it somewhat curious that people throw around the word "compromise" > in the context of the software freedoms as if it's actually desirable--"we > should compromise, give up our principles and our freedoms in order to > have more stuff in Debian!" (Pardon the exaggeration; I have in mind > the attitudes of some others, not you.) Whenever I see the word 'compromise', I think 'security compromise'. And I've yet to see a case where that was a bad way to approach it. A compromise is a solution that nobody wanted. It's one of the worst answers you can ever get. Find a better one. Compromising is the last resort of the politician. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature