fair use internationally (was Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: fair use internationally (was Re: Bug#265352: grub: Debian splash images for Grub
- From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 22:07:04 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] d7j52s$m1c$2@sea.gmane.org>
- References: <200408200151.26713.neroden@fastmail.fm> <414DF049.3040801@verizon.net> <E1C99zK-0007IZ-00@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <4151B05C.70607@verizon.net> <20040922174129.wAye8t.gwVdRN@rano.org> <41531ECD.7030101@verizon.net> <20040923221523.GC16697@zewt.org> <20040923223729.GD16697@zewt.org> <41535B18.4070104@verizon.net>
Performing thread necromancy....
Josh Triplett wrote:
> There is a strong case for Fair Use of the imagery based on the latter
> two factors. The actual use of the imagery in the game is also
> more-or-less a parody, which is a protected right.
>
> Nevertheless, as you said in your previous message, these rights are
> (unfortunately) not universal.
Do we know what the "worst" jurisdiction's laws about this are? I know that
the UK has a much more limited "fair dealing" right. Are there
jurisdictions with even more limited rights? I think virtually every
jurisdiction has some sort of "quotation for the purposes of review"
exception, though I could be wrong. What's the worst case we actually have
to care about?
This would be a good thing to know. :-)
--
This space intentionally left blank.
Reply to: