Re: [Fwd: Re: Bug#304316: section non-free/doc]
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 11:24:51AM +0400, Olleg Samoylov wrote:
> License of documents in gnu-standards restrict modification documents.
> And reason easily undestanded, standard can't be called standard if can
> be modified by everyone.
(response is addressed to the list, not the poster)
Repeat #507. Does anyone happen to remember a good, concise archived reply
to these oft-repeated arguments? (The responses are standard: modifying
standards is useful and acceptable, no practical line can be drawn
between documentation and programs, no solid arguments for why the DFSG
*shouldn't* apply to everything in Debian have been given, and the
rest of it.) This stuff has been argued to death so many times, I'm not
even sure where to start looking, but linking these posts to two or three
previous responses is probably a better bet than responding to the old
arguments all over again.