Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, debian-kernel@lists.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
From: Humberto Massa <humberto.massa@almg.gov.br>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:44:55 -0300
Message-id: <[🔎] 425A6337.9030305@almg.gov.br>
In-reply-to: <VrRWRB.A.IlC.3y-VCB@murphy>
References: <VrRWRB.A.IlC.3y-VCB@murphy>

Adrian Bunk wrote:

Even RedHat with a stronger financial background than Debian consideredthe MP3 patents being serious enough to remove MP3 support.

Actually, they did it to spite the patent holders.
[]s
Massa

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Next by Date: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Previous by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Next by thread: Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread