[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Draft summary of Creative Commons 2.0 licenses (version 3)



On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 08:31:20 -0400 Evan Prodromou wrote:

> > So in summary, I think that "10 million" is pure fiction.

Maybe or maybe not.
I'm not saying that those data should be trusted, nor am I saying that
they shouldn't.
/According/ to that statistical results, we can say that... 

> 
> Does it really matter? We don't have access to the Creative Commons
> Web logs nor their referrer count for the "Some Rights Reserved" image
> (which is what they use for counting), so we can't audit this number.
> I don't see why we have to.

We don't have to, actually.
What I was saying was simply something like "If those data can be
trusted, we can draw the following conclusions: ..."

> 
> I'm going to modify the cc summary to say "many". Can we all agree to
> "many"? I know that we have more than 5000 articles and images on
> Wikitravel alone, and I'd say that's more than enough to call them
> "many".

This sounds like a good idea: it even enhances the summary longevity (it
will be true in the foreseeable future, as well as now).


-- 
    :-(   This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS?   ;-)
......................................................................
  Francesco Poli                             GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
 Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12  31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4

Attachment: pgpQs0N2TPcbH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: