On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:41:55PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 03:10:24AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > I see nothing other than an appeal to a silent majority. Do you really > > want me to post the lurker song? You're getting awfully close. > > > > Anyway, no points to answer; my previous mail stands. > > Evading Matthew's counterarguments doesn't convince anyone but yourself. He didn't *make* any counterarguments. His mail approximated "I'm right, you're wrong, nyah nyah nyah". There's no practical response to that. > You're claiming, as far as I can tell, that any license that can be twisted > in a non-free way is categorically non-free. No. http://dilbert.com/comics/dilbert/archive/dilbert-20050324.html -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature