Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo
Matthew Garrett <email@example.com> writes:
> MJ Ray <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Matthew Garrett <email@example.com> wrote:
>>> But how do you argue that a hand-crafted binary is sufficiently
>>> modifiable without also admitting the possibility that the output
>>> of a C compiler may be sufficiently modifiable?
>> I think it depends what the upstream author is using as source.
>> How about you?
> Why does it depend on what the upstream author is using as source? How
> does that affect the recipient's ability to modify the work?
One way to think about it is that one's ability to modify a work using a
particular source is better indicated by the author's choice of source
than J. Random User's.
In other words, what the author chooses as source is a good predictor of
what other folks are best off using as source. I'm not willing to
override the author's opinion without a _very_ good reason, and even
then only on a case-by-case basis with lots of discussion.
Jeremy Hankins <firstname.lastname@example.org>
PGP fingerprint: 748F 4D16 538E 75D6 8333 9E10 D212 B5ED 37D0 0A03