Re: Let's stop feeding the NVidia cuckoo
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Jeremy Hankins wrote:
> No, it doesn't. The lone JPEG is only non-free if the lossless version
> is what the original author would use to make a modification to the
> JPEG. If, for example, the original author threw out the lossless
> version immediately on making the JPEG, that's strong evidence it's not
Not necessarily. It might be that at the time the original author had no
intention of any future modifications at all.