Re: Draft: Graphviz summary
Scripsit Jon Dowland <email@example.com>
> Henning Makholm <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> For the record, I'm withdrawing this draft. I still think it is a
>> reasonable accurate description of the consensus, but I have been
>> convinced that aiming for http://www.d.o/legal/* is not the right way
>> to proceed.
> What do you think the best way to proceed, is? I almost fell out of my
> chair when I read that graphviz might be DFSG... is this possibility
> slipping from us? :(
As for graphviz, the matter is not urgent anymore. It was uploaded
to main even before I wrote the summary draft (but without my knowing
it). It is even in testing/main now.
We'll want IBM or AT&T to fix the license before the consensus changes
to consider the license bugs non-free, though.
Henning Makholm "I can get fat! I can sing!"