Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Firefox/Thunderbird trademarks: a proposal
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>
- Date: 03 Feb 2005 11:21:20 GMT
- Message-id: <[🔎] 4202092f$0$19159$cc9e4d1f@news-text.dial.pipex.com>
- References: <41EE526E.4020402@mozilla.org> <41EE8243.4050901@jwsdot.com> <41EE837D.8000306@mozilla.org> <41EE9D46.3050500@jwsdot.com> <87ekghqny5.fsf@kreon.lan.henning.makholm.net> <41EEAE22.5000407@jwsdot.com> <20050120061502.GX6870@nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca> <41F16592.80903@mozilla.org> <20050121214445.GA13170@nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca> <41F19FF8.1080508@mozilla.org> <20050122054522.GD14617@nightcrawler.kuroneko.ca> <[🔎] 41FF825C.600@mozilla.org>
Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> wrote:
> Let's take just one example. The Mozilla Foundation is very keen that
> nothing ships as "Firefox" which contains spyware. How would you define
> "spyware" in a watertight way for the trademark license document?
It looks like it's called "Software Update" at the moment. I keep
switching it off, but it just doesn't stay off. If I change that
setting, my derived browser mysteriously becomes unable to save its
preferences file... :-/ Time for a rebuild try approaches anyway,
but I don't think I introduced this bug.
Reply to: