[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Eclipse 3.0 Running ILLEGALY on Kaffe

On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:18:56PM -0500, Walter Landry wrote:
> You have made a very convincing argument that "required to install" is
> too broad.  My criteria is "required to run".

If you're talking about the scope of copyright law, or the relevance of
the license granted by the GPL, you're talking about "required to copy".

If you're talking about the DFSG, you're not talking about a legal issue,
but a set of guidelines, and the scope is Debian, and adoption into
its archives.

You might have some personal "require to run" criteria, for some context.
But please don't mistake that for a copyright issue.


Reply to: