On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 12:47:21PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote: > Good luck proving your replacement isn't a derived work after you've > studied the GPLed work you are replacing. Actually, he has a point there. There has to be significantly more going on than "read the GPLed work" for some other work to be a derived work. Remember: copyright protects creative expression, not functionality. -- Raul