Re: SableVM/Kaffe pissing contest
Walter Landry writes:
> Michael Poole <mdpoole@troilus.org> wrote:
> >
> > As has been explained on debian-legal, the interpretation you propose
> > would mean that the GPL is a non-DFSG-free license.
>
> Where was that? I have seen no such convincing explanation.
Eclipse compiled against Kaffe and distributed separately would not
violate the GPL: the compiled verison of Eclipse would not be a
derivative of Kaffe. If distributing them together violates the GPL,
then the GPL contaminates Kaffe in violation of DFSG #9.
Michael Poole
Reply to: