On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 09:59:22AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:57:49PM -0400, lex@cc.gatech.edu wrote: > > The Dictator Test goes well beyond DFSG. DFSG clause 1 merely says > > that there is no fee or payment for the software. Nothing in DFSG says > > that the license must make no requirements at all. The Dictator > > Test is a stronger test. > > The dictator test, as I read it, does not say that a licence must make no > requirements at all. Every permission grant other than placing a work in > the Public Domain would fail if that were the case. > > Would you care to base your assertion on fact and logic? (5 days later...) Perhaps not. :-/ -- G. Branden Robinson | I am only good at complaining. Debian GNU/Linux | You don't want me near your code. branden@debian.org | -- Dan Jacobson http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature