Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
Nathanael Nerode <neroden@twcny.rr.com> wrote:
>Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> You could look at it that way. On the other hand, if I release my
>> GPLed code under 3(b) then anyone who receives it can pass on the offer
>> I gave them (under 3(c)). I am then obliged to pass on my modifications
>> directly to people who I never provided binaries to. Is distribution
>> under 3(b) and 3(c) non-free?
>
>If those were the only options, it was the loose consensus that that would
>not be free.
Really? Wow. That's insane.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59-chiark.mail.debian.legal@srcf.ucam.org
Reply to: