Re: Visualboy Advance question.
- To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Visualboy Advance question.
- From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 06:05:24 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20040707110524.GE7286@redwald.deadbeast.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-legal@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <20040620183642.454bdaf9.frx@firenze.linux.it>
- References: <1087677566.28264.4.camel@localhost> <40D4ABA4.8080001@cs.colostate.edu> <1087681244.11830.32.camel@unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <40D4BB8B.8020707@cs.colostate.edu> <1087685272.11830.50.camel@unicorn.bad-people-of-the-future.san-francisco.ca.us> <20040620183642.454bdaf9.frx@firenze.linux.it>
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 06:36:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I think that DFSG-free emulators should be in main as long as they don't
> *depend* on non-free packages. Usefulness is, IMHO, a completely
> different matter.
I don't think we should be putting useless software in our archive, let
alone in main.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Measure with micrometer,
Debian GNU/Linux | mark with chalk,
branden@debian.org | cut with axe,
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hope like hell.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: