On Sun, May 09, 2004 at 02:46:39AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Diego Biurrun wrote: > > > On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 01:22:24PM +0200, Matthieu Moy wrote: > >> > >> +------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ > >> | | | | | | > >> | A | | B | | C | > >> | | | | | | > >> | SystemC |<--1-->| My software |<--2-->| GCC | > >> | | | | | | > >> +------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ > >> > >> Where <--n--> can be either a static or a dynamic link. > >> > >> I would like to use as permissive licenses as possible. Ideally, I > >> would like the following : > >> > >> A = SystemC license > >> B = LGPL > >> C = GPL > > > > gcc is LGPL. > > No. GCC has different parts under different licenses (although all are > GPL-compatible). Parts are GPL, parts are LGPL, parts are GPL with special > libgcc exception, etc. I don't believe there are any LGPL parts. -- .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield : :' : http://www.debian.org/ | `. `' | `- -><- |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature