Re: GFDL
MJ Ray said on Sat, May 08, 2004 at 02:45:04AM +0100,:
> Has the "GNU project encyclopaedia" problem ever been adequately
> dealt with? This is the idea that you cannot incorporate a work
> with the "Invariant GNU Manifesto" into an encyclopedia of the GNU
> project because the manifesto is no longer secondary, so cannot be
> invariant. I remember some answers that this is a silly book to
> want to produce if you are not FSF (who hold the copyright and can
> do as they please), but that's not usually the licensor's choice in
> a free licence.
Oh. I was oblivious to this aspect.
--
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Mahesh T. Pai, LL.M.,
'NANDINI', S. R. M. Road,
Ernakulam, Cochin-682018,
Kerala, India.
http://paivakil.port5.com
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~+
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GFDL
- From: Stephen Ryan <taketwoaspirin@deepthought.dartmouth.edu>
- References:
- Re: GFDL
- From: "Mahesh T. Pai" <paivakil@vsnl.net>
- Re: GFDL
- From: MJ Ray <mjr@dsl.pipex.com>