On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 12:24:00PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > > The original Artistic license is not appropriate for licensing > anything that is not approximately perl, because of the way it is > worded. It is a terrible license. Do not use it. It's also highly > questionable as to whether things licensed under it can be included in > Debian, given the prohibitions on commercial distribution. Please ask > upstream to replace it with the Clarified Artistic license (or some > other free software license) before this is included in Debian. > The upstream author has kindly relicensed under the Clarified Artistic Licence. (Please Cc me on any -legal correspondence, I'm not subscribed). regards Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature