Re: Debian Official Use Logo is packaged in desktop-base
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:07:59AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
[some attribution got lost here]
> > > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my
> > > understanding, it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in the
> > > Debian archive. I don't believe this is silly, bizarre or
> > > hypocritical.
> >
> > I on the other hand think it is all of the above. What happened to
> > the comittee that was looking into this?
>
> I don't recall a committee, and I'm not sure why there would have been
> one. The OU logo is deliberately non-free--it would serve no purpose
> if it was freely usable.
For the sake of my sanity, can we not use the abbreviation "OU" when the
two things between which it's disambiguating are "Official Use" and
"Open Use"? :)
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: