Re: GPL compatible license?
Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Martin Schulze <email@example.com> writes:
> > Not sure if this is possible but would it be fine when modified to read:
> > 3. Furthermore, if you distribute Elm software or parts of Elm, with
> > or without additions developed by you or others, then you must
> > make available the source to all portions of the new system
> > upon request.
> I don't think so -- it requires me to keep around a copy of the entire
> source for any system I distribute *forever*.
Uh? Where do you read that?
Isn't "all portions of the new system" the same as "the entire sourcecode
of your fork or what you distribute in binary form"?
The only stupid question is the unasked one.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.