Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies
>On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 04:42:00PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>> So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can
>> ignore it's running on your system? Which part of the policy or SC
>> justifies this theory?
>No, I've been saying that non-free software can be ignored as long as
>it's not a part of our system.
How do you define what is part of our system, and from what you derive