[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mass bug filing for unmet dependencies

> >You're asking why I think "can be flashed, but works just fine without
> >being flashed" is different from "won't work without being loaded"?
> >
> >Fundamentally, the latter case forces us to not ignore it.  The equipment
> >won't work if we ignore the issue.

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:51:56AM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> So you say that non-free software is OK with you as long as you can
> pretend it's not there? Which part of the policy or SC justifies this
> theory?

So you say that I was talking about pretending?  Which part of what I
wrote justifies this interpretation?



Reply to: