Re: missing licenses in gnulib
email@example.com (Karl Berry) writes:
> About the modules/ files. I wrote most of them. What kind of copyright
> would you find useful, given that it's only meta-information?
> I suggest, based on the advice in maintain.texi:
> Copyright (C) 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> Copying and distribution of this file, with or without modification,
> are permitted in any medium without royalty provided the copyright
> notice and this notice are preserved.
> Perhaps it is ok to just put this in a modules/README file and say all
> the modules/* files are covered by it.
IMHO, I'd rather fix gnulib-tool to ignore lines starting with # (if
gnulib-tool doesn't do this already). Then we can support comments in
the module meta-info files, including license of the file itself.