[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Clarifying non-free parts of the GNU FDL



On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 10:03:22PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> I'm fine with recommending that people dual-license; as you say, it's
> a PITA otherwise.  But incompatibility with the GPL does not cause
> GFDL non-freeness.

Assuming you meant DFSG here, I don't think anyone is suggesting that it
does.

-- 
Glenn Maynard



Reply to: