Re: GPL-licensed packages with depend-chain to OpenSSL
On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:13:47PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Consider bash + script X + glibc -- this is mere aggregation.
This doesn't seem to be an interesting example.
Most scripts are so trivial, that [at least in the u.s.] they fall under
fair use.
I've never seen a bash-specific script distributed under a license
which had terms which conflict with the GPL -- let alone one where the
bash-specific script had more than fair-use code which depended on bash.
--
Raul
Reply to: