Re: Free Art License
Josh Triplett wrote:
>> 7. Sub-licensing
>> Sub-licenses are not authorized by the present license. Any person who
>> wishes to make use of the rights that it confers will be directly bound
>> to the author of the original work.
> This is the oddity referred to above. First of all, based on the
> language in clause 2.2, "originals (original and subsequent)", it is
> possible that each new modified version is considered both a modified
> version of its predecessors (subsequent to their licenses), and an
> original work of its own (with a license from the modifier). If so, and
> if this clause is simply stating that modified versions are subject to
> the original author's license, that's fine.
I believe this is exactly what it is saying. If you know someone who knows
legal French, they can check. I see no point in going into further detail
when reading a translation.
This space intentionally left blank.