Re: Open Software License v2.1
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:15:59PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 12:24:31PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 12, 2004 at 10:39:39PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> > > I'm not sure that this clause necessarily passes the DFSG, but it's
>> > > clear that the OSI has made a good and, in my opinion, successful
>> > > effort to clean
>> > > it up. It's neither fair nor correct to say that nothing has
>> > > changed.
>> >
>> > It's still non-free for the same reasons, so nothing relevant has
>> > changed.
>>
>> You mean that you still believe it's non-free because nothing relevant
>> to your reasons has changed, and you're pretending that other
>> perspectives don't exist.
>
> Irrelevant by the law of limiting factors. But I haven't seen anybody
> seriously advance any other positions.
You haven't been reading my postings?
--
This space intentionally left blank.
Reply to: