Sven Luther wrote: > On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 02:12:54PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > >>On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:30:04PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: >> >>>[1] http://www.washington.edu/pine/faq/legal.html#10.2 >>> >>>(Accusing Free Software programmers of "perverting" the license by doing >>>things they were clearly granted permission to do; that's wonderful.) >> >>Wasn't the force behind the license "re-interpreation" to stop people from >>distributing Pine with a maildir patch? > > Like cdrecord with a dvdrecord patch, and yaboot with anything but pristing > upstream source ? Altough at lest in the yaboot case, it is not licencing that > is used, but threat to remove the debian yaboot mention from the official yaboot > web page of supported yaboto versions. That's interesting; could you point me towards a reference for this? I can't seem to find one via Google. (Or was it in private mail?) - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature