Re: license for eSvn

[Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>]

* Sven Luther:

> On Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 04:16:41PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Sven Luther:
>> 
>> > Still, it only applies to the not linked with GPLed Qt case, so should be
>> > ignorable for us, right ? 
>> 
>> Only you if you interpret "eSvn License for Unix platforms" as a mere
>> placeholder (like "Licensing Option 2").  It's not clear if Debian is
>> a Unix platform.
>
> We don't care about that, the licence says :
>
>   if you are linking with the GPLed version of Qt, then the code is under the
>   GPL.
>
> So, we can ignore all this non-GPLed QT and unix-plateform mess, can't we ? 

I'd rather see a clarification from upstream.  If they intent to
prevent a GPLed Windows port, it's non-free.  If they just want to
make sure that people may distribute Windows binaries, it's probably okay.