[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: Choice of venue argumentation.




On Jul 23, 2004, at 11:32, Sven Luther wrote:

Ok, still do you think that a judge would have no consideration if the
defendent is a poor student on the other side of the world, or otherwise has not the physical means to be present ? And in this case, how could the judge
make the judgement binding anyway ?

I have no idea how it works in France, but if, for example, a judge in California entered a judgement against me (even though I live 3,000 miles away, in Virginia) it's quite binding, and the plaintiff can then go do things like seize assets, etc.



Reply to: