Re: DRAFT: debian-legal summary of the QPL
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 02:01:57PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> I apparently just forgot it in the flood; thanks for pointing it out
> again. Of course, that definition would mean that DFSG1 doesn't cover a
> license that says you must distribute a dollar along with any copy, but
> that's a minor issue, and to my knowledge, no such license exists yet.
It does; it's a restriction, and DFSG#1 says "may not restrict". (see
other posts messages re: "fee" being an example, not the only disallowed
restriction, "may not distribute on Thursday", etc)
--
Glenn Maynard
Reply to: