Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 11:27:05PM +0200, luther@debian.org wrote: >>>The correct course of action is for d-legal to make a reasonable suggestion, >> >>Thanks, but in all this thread, i have not seen a single reasonable >>suggestion, so i have some doubts about this. > > Yes, you have: dual-license under the GPL. It's a completely reasonable, > sane suggestion, applicable in the vast majority of cases. It may very > well not be applicable in this particular case, but it's still a sane and > reasonable suggestion in most cases, and fits my explanation of "course of > action" exactly. For that matter, I also mentioned that the alternative of simply waiving the two problematic clauses, which would be the smallest possible change, will be included in the second draft of the summary. - Josh Triplett
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature