[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ocaml & QPL : Clause 3b in question now.



On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 21:56:06 +0200, Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr> wrote:

> And i can't take you seriously as long as people like Brian are allowed to 
> participate in this discussion which such low-quality contributions.

What's this part all about? If his posts really bother you that much
and you don't want to read what he writes, add him to your killfile.
The only reason I could see you wanting to ban him from the list
altogether is if you're afraid that others won't agree that his
contributions are of such low quality after all, and thus you want to
gag him instead of attempting to rebut his arguments.

--
Andrew Saunders





Apart from the fact that he clearly has made a lot of valuable
contributions to this list in the past, I think advocating banning him
from posting is an extreme overreaction.
 
> > > Friendly,
> >
> > Please try harder.
> 
> And you, do you try to be reasonable ? you only defend Brian because he is a
> long timer here, and one of your crow of time-loser who discuss things in
> round without even bothering to provide serious advice. What do i gain to
> participate here, only hours of lost time. I feel like i will provide my
> analysis in the debian copyright file of the ocaml package, and discuss this
> directly with the ftp-masters, or the RM. There is absolutely no credibility
> left here as long as such bullshit is allowed.
> 
> And yes, if i sound pissed, i am. It is now almost one week since this
> bullshit started, and we haven't advanced one bit, and you are all so imbued
> with your righteouness that you don't even bother reading the licence you are
> criticing, nor the comment that don't agree with you.
> 
> Friendly, still,
> 
> 
> 
> Sven Luther
> >
> > Regards,
> > Walter Landry
> > wlandry@ucsd.edu
> 
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-legal-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 
>



Reply to: