Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 08:38:57AM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
> > Well, what is it you want to do ? You are just angry that the licence is not
> > BSD and that you can do anything you want with it, that's it. Seriously, no
> > sympathy from me, as you clearly intented to make proprietary modifications.
> No, I'd be happy with a Free copyleft. For example, if the OCaml
> compiler were licensed to me under the GNU GPL, I'd be very happy.
> Then I'd be able to make the modifications I want, link it with the
> proprietary crap I have to link it with, and distribute that to the
> people I'm working with.
Please don't bother writing to me again. Your previous posts have made it
clear that you don't even bother reading here anything apart from the posts
which interests you, and that you have no problem making half backed claims
based on pure speculation. You have totally shot your credibility with posts
So please go away and stop loosing everyones time.