Re: Bug#227159: ocaml: Worse, the QPL is not DFSG-free
On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 03:14:19PM -0800, D. Starner wrote:
> > after you (plural and impersonal you) all dragged me into this
> > mud pit
>
> I've have watched many extended arguments, and participated in
> many myself. When I get involved in an argument like you have,
> it's a clear sign I have too much time on my hands or I'm
No, it is a clear sign that i, and others behind me who chose not to speak,
fear that we have to get involved into this, unless we will see over two years
of packaging work and good relationship to upstream go to nothing because of
some poorly argumented claim that the QPL is none-free.
> avoiding work. If you are concerned about your time, don't
> respond to every post making the same responses to the same
> arguments; make a few well thought out and clear posts.
Mmm, well, my first post was so, and i waited various days before starting
this thread again, and i got _NO_ reasonable response that way, so ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: